<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simple Certified Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/704/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/704</link>
	<description>Leveraging Technology to Practice Law More Effectively</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:36:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Newmark</title>
		<link>http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/704/comment-page-1#comment-38884</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Newmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/?p=704#comment-38884</guid>
		<description>Anita:

I saw your question about the Return Receipt (Electronic). I hope the following provides you with reassurance. 

The United States Postal Service created the Return Receipt (Electronic) in order to eliminate the complexities of using the PS3811 (Green Card).  Accordingly, the United States Postal Service Domestic Mail Manual states that the Return Receipt (Electronic) is the legal equivalent of the PS3811. Of course, the USPS can state this in their manual, but what matters is whether state courts accept the Return Receipt (Electronic) for Affidavits of Service. Fortunately, from all we know, the Return Receipt (Electronic) has never been refused by a state court. Instead, once courts learned about the Return Receipt (Electronic) they were very receptive to this innovation as the RR(E) PDF file can be easily produced, or reproduced, and isn’t subject to the same risks as the PS3811 Green Card which must always be submitted in its original form.

Please write with any other questions. We have hundreds of very satisfied users and I hope you&#039;ll give us a try. 

Thx.
Andrew Newmark
Chief Marketing Officer
SimpleCertifiedMail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anita:</p>
<p>I saw your question about the Return Receipt (Electronic). I hope the following provides you with reassurance. </p>
<p>The United States Postal Service created the Return Receipt (Electronic) in order to eliminate the complexities of using the PS3811 (Green Card).  Accordingly, the United States Postal Service Domestic Mail Manual states that the Return Receipt (Electronic) is the legal equivalent of the PS3811. Of course, the USPS can state this in their manual, but what matters is whether state courts accept the Return Receipt (Electronic) for Affidavits of Service. Fortunately, from all we know, the Return Receipt (Electronic) has never been refused by a state court. Instead, once courts learned about the Return Receipt (Electronic) they were very receptive to this innovation as the RR(E) PDF file can be easily produced, or reproduced, and isn’t subject to the same risks as the PS3811 Green Card which must always be submitted in its original form.</p>
<p>Please write with any other questions. We have hundreds of very satisfied users and I hope you&#8217;ll give us a try. </p>
<p>Thx.<br />
Andrew Newmark<br />
Chief Marketing Officer<br />
SimpleCertifiedMail.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Sims</title>
		<link>http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/704/comment-page-1#comment-38876</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Sims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/?p=704#comment-38876</guid>
		<description>I understand the concern Anita, however, they claim that the electronic confirmation carries the same legal force as the green card. However, I have not seen any citation for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the concern Anita, however, they claim that the electronic confirmation carries the same legal force as the green card. However, I have not seen any citation for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita</title>
		<link>http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/704/comment-page-1#comment-38871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/?p=704#comment-38871</guid>
		<description>it looks great, but...I&#039;d be a little concerned about not having the original receipt signature to introduce in court.  Did they say anything about that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it looks great, but&#8230;I&#8217;d be a little concerned about not having the original receipt signature to introduce in court.  Did they say anything about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Sims</title>
		<link>http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/704/comment-page-1#comment-38844</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Sims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/?p=704#comment-38844</guid>
		<description>No Jason, I am not yet using their service. However, it is quite appealing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Jason, I am not yet using their service. However, it is quite appealing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Connected Lawyer » Simple Certified Mail &#124; StampRange.Com</title>
		<link>http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/704/comment-page-1#comment-38785</link>
		<dc:creator>The Connected Lawyer » Simple Certified Mail &#124; StampRange.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/?p=704#comment-38785</guid>
		<description>[...] Excerpt from: The Connected Lawyer » Simple Certified Mail [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Excerpt from: The Connected Lawyer » Simple Certified Mail [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/704/comment-page-1#comment-38749</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/?p=704#comment-38749</guid>
		<description>Bryan,
Have you started using SimpleCertifiedMail.com?  If so, what did you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan,<br />
Have you started using SimpleCertifiedMail.com?  If so, what did you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
