<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Connected Lawyer &#187; Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/category/ethics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com</link>
	<description>Leveraging Technology to Practice Law More Effectively</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Electronically Archiving Your Client Files</title>
		<link>http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/114</link>
		<comments>http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/114#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you considering archiving your closed client files only in an electronic format? If so, you should check out this article from the ABA. The article discusses the rules that apply in specific states, such as Maine, New York, and Missouri. This is good reading for anyone thinking about ditching those paper files permanently.
Additional information [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="ABA" href="http://www.abanet.org"><img width="307" height="48" align="left" alt="ABA" title="ABA" src="http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/aba.gif" /></a>Are you considering archiving your closed client files only in an electronic format? If so, you should check out <a title="Archiving client files ABA" href="http://www.abanet.org/media/youraba/200512/article01.html">this article</a> from the <a title="ABA" href="http://www.abanet.org">ABA</a>. The article discusses the rules that apply in specific states, such as Maine, New York, and Missouri. This is good reading for anyone thinking about ditching those paper files permanently.</p>
<p>Additional information from the ABA about file retention can be found <a title="ABA File Retention" href="http://www.abanet.org/cpr/ethicsearch/file_retention.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/114/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Will Save on Business Card Expenses</title>
		<link>http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/42</link>
		<comments>http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/42#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know that this really has nothing to do with technology, but I could not pass on commenting on this. Susan Cartier Liebel of Build a Solo Practice LLC posted a few days ago about a proposed North Carolina ethics opinion that (and no I am not making this up) prohibits an attorney from giving [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that this really has nothing to do with technology, but I could not pass on commenting on this. <a title="SCL" target="_blank" href="http://susancartierliebel.typepad.com/about.html">Susan Cartier Liebel</a> of <a title="Build a Solo Practice" target="_blank" href="http://susancartierliebel.typepad.com/build_a_solo_practice/">Build a Solo Practice LLC</a> posted a few days ago about a <a title="NC Ethics proposal" target="_blank" href="http://susancartierliebel.typepad.com/build_a_solo_practice/2007/03/ethics_opinions.html">proposed North Carolina ethics opinion</a> that (and no I am not making this up) prohibits an attorney from giving a client,a non-client, a fellow attorney or an allied professional more than one business card or one firm brochure. As quoted by Susan, the examples state:</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify"><strong><span style="font-size: 0.8em"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Inquiry:</span></span></strong></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify" />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify"><span style="font-size: 0.8em"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">If a client, non-client, fellow attorney, or allied professional requests one or more business cards or firm brochures from the estate-planning attorney, may the estate-planning attorney oblige the request?</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify" />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify"><strong>Opinion:</strong><span style="color: #000000; font-size: 0.8em"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: Arial"> </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify"><span style="font-size: 0.8em"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The attorney may give a third party one of his business cards or one brochure in response to a request. The attorney may not give the third party multiple cards or brochures because of the risk of in-person solicitation by the third party on the attorney’s behalf.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify" />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify"><strong>Inquiry:</strong></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify"><span style="font-size: 0.8em"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Along with a thank-you letter from the attorney to a client for the client’s having allowed the attorney to provide services to that client, may the attorney include a business card and/or firm brochure with the suggestion that the client, if so willing, pass it along to someone who the client thinks might need similar services?</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify" />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify"><strong>Opinion:</strong><span style="color: #000000; font-size: 0.8em"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: Arial"><br />
</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify"><span style="font-size: 0.8em"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">No, because of the risk of in-person solicitation by the third party on the attorney’s behalf.</span></span></div>
</blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify">The actual proposals can be found on the <a title="NC Bar" target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbar.com">North Carolina Bar&#8217;s website</a>, about halfway down <a title="NC Bar" target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbar.com/ethics/propeth.asp">this page</a>.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify" />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify">This is one of the most ridiculous things I have seen. <a title="Chuck Newton" target="_blank" href="http://stayviolation.typepad.com/chucknewton/2007/03/im_mad_as_hell_.html">Chuck Newton has similar thoughts</a> on the &#8220;merits&#8221; of this proposal.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theconnectedlawyer.com/archives/42/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
